Kiribati vs Tajikistan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Kiribati
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 13.3% against 8.9% in Kiribati, a difference of 4.4%.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.5 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Kiribati ranks 6th and Tajikistan ranks 3rd of 172 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -5.3% | 3.1% | 8.4% | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 4.7% | 0.7% | 4.0% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 9.3% | 7.3% | 2.0% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Kiribati or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 13.3% against 8.9% in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Kiribati and Tajikistan?
- 4.4%, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tajikistan?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Tajikistan rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Kiribati ranks 6th and Tajikistan ranks 3rd of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.