Kazakhstan vs Montenegro: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Kazakhstan
- Montenegro
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 5.4% against 5.3% in Montenegro, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Montenegro ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 23rd and Montenegro ranks 24th of 172 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.1% | 2.7% | 2.4% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 4.7% | 2.4% | 2.3% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 2.7% | 6.5% | 3.8% | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Kazakhstan or Montenegro?
- Kazakhstan, at 5.4% against 5.3% in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Kazakhstan and Montenegro?
- 0.1%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Montenegro rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Kazakhstan ranks 23rd and Montenegro ranks 24th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.