Iceland vs Timor-Leste: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Iceland
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 2.9% against 2.8% in Iceland, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Iceland ranks 70th and Timor-Leste ranks 68th of 172 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | -3.1% | 3.1% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 1.5% | 1.0% | 0.5% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 1.5% | 2.0% | 0.5% | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Iceland or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 2.9% against 2.8% in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Iceland and Timor-Leste?
- 0.1%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Timor-Leste?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Timor-Leste rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Iceland ranks 70th and Timor-Leste ranks 68th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.