IBRD only vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- IBRD only
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 8.0% against 4.2% in IBRD only, a difference of 3.8%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.9 times IBRD only's.
The two have swapped places 18 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1996 it was IBRD only ahead.
IBRD only ranks 9th and Rwanda ranks 8th of 42 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, IBRD only averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.7% | 2.6% | 0.1% | IBRD only |
| 2000s | 4.4% | 4.9% | 0.5% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 4.5% | 3.5% | 1.0% | IBRD only |
| 2020s | 3.7% | -0.3% | 4.0% | IBRD only |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, IBRD only or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 8.0% against 4.2% in IBRD only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between IBRD only and Rwanda?
- 3.8%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Rwanda?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do IBRD only and Rwanda rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- IBRD only ranks 9th and Rwanda ranks 8th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.