IBRD only vs Kiribati: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- IBRD only
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 8.9% against 4.2% in IBRD only, a difference of 4.7%.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 2.1 times IBRD only's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was IBRD only ahead.
IBRD only ranks 9th and Kiribati ranks 6th of 42 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, IBRD only averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.6% | -5.3% | 9.9% | IBRD only |
| 2010s | 4.5% | 4.7% | 0.1% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 3.7% | 9.3% | 5.6% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, IBRD only or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 8.9% against 4.2% in IBRD only as of 2024.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between IBRD only and Kiribati?
- 4.7%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Kiribati?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do IBRD only and Kiribati rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- IBRD only ranks 9th and Kiribati ranks 6th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.