Honduras vs Latvia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Honduras
- Latvia
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 1.8% against 1.8% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 100th and Latvia ranks 101st of 172 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.6% | 4.8% | 10.7% | Honduras |
| 2000s | 2.8% | 5.9% | 3.1% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 2.1% | 4.2% | 2.0% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 2.8% | 2.0% | 0.8% | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Honduras or Latvia?
- Honduras, at 1.8% against 1.8% in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Honduras and Latvia?
- 0.0%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Honduras and Latvia rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Honduras ranks 100th and Latvia ranks 101st of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.