Gabon vs Korea: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Gabon
- Korea
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 1.5% against 1.4% in Korea, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 26 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Gabon ahead.
Gabon ranks 111th and Korea ranks 112th of 172 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 1 and Korea in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.7% | 4.9% | 3.8% | Gabon |
| 1970s | 5.7% | 6.2% | 0.5% | Korea |
| 1980s | 1.3% | 6.3% | 5.0% | Korea |
| 1990s | -2.6% | 5.6% | 8.3% | Korea |
| 2000s | 0.3% | 3.6% | 3.3% | Korea |
| 2010s | 1.0% | 2.2% | 1.2% | Korea |
| 2020s | -1.3% | 1.3% | 2.6% | Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Gabon or Korea?
- Gabon, at 1.5% against 1.4% in Korea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Gabon and Korea?
- 0.1%, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Korea?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
- How do Gabon and Korea rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Gabon ranks 111th and Korea ranks 112th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.