Ecuador vs Niger: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Ecuador
- Niger
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 1.9% against 1.8% in Niger, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Niger's.
The two have swapped places 20 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 97th and Niger ranks 99th of 172 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Niger in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1% | -1.2% | 1.3% | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 0.6% | -0.3% | 0.9% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 1.8% | 1.4% | 0.4% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 1.0% | 2.7% | 1.7% | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Ecuador or Niger?
- Ecuador, at 1.9% against 1.8% in Niger as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Ecuador and Niger?
- 0.1%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Niger?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Niger rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Ecuador ranks 97th and Niger ranks 99th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.