Denmark vs Honduras: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Denmark
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 1.8% against 1.7% in Denmark, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 102nd and Honduras ranks 100th of 172 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Honduras in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.9% | -0.8% | 5.7% | Denmark |
| 1970s | 2.1% | 4.2% | 2.1% | Honduras |
| 1980s | 1.2% | 3.4% | 2.3% | Honduras |
| 1990s | 1.7% | 15.9% | 14.2% | Honduras |
| 2000s | 1.0% | 2.8% | 1.8% | Honduras |
| 2010s | 1.1% | 2.1% | 1.0% | Honduras |
| 2020s | -0.1% | 2.8% | 2.8% | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Denmark or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 1.8% against 1.7% in Denmark as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Denmark and Honduras?
- 0.1%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Honduras?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2025.
- How do Denmark and Honduras rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Denmark ranks 102nd and Honduras ranks 100th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.