Cuba vs Pakistan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Cuba
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.6% against 0.5% in Cuba, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 131st and Pakistan ranks 128th of 172 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.0% | 1.4% | 0.4% | Pakistan |
| 1990s | -3.0% | 1.9% | 4.9% | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 3.3% | 1.1% | 2.2% | Cuba |
| 2010s | 3.8% | 3.2% | 0.6% | Cuba |
| 2020s | -0.8% | 2.6% | 3.4% | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Cuba or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 0.6% against 0.5% in Cuba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Cuba and Pakistan?
- 0.1%, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Pakistan?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Pakistan rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Cuba ranks 131st and Pakistan ranks 128th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.