Brunei vs New Zealand: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Brunei
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports -1.7% against -2.5% in Brunei, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 18 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Brunei ahead.
Brunei ranks 162nd and New Zealand ranks 160th of 172 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brunei averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.6% | 1.1% | 0.4% | Brunei |
| 2000s | 1.9% | 2.1% | 0.2% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 2.1% | 2.2% | 0.1% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 9.4% | 0.8% | 8.5% | Brunei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Brunei or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at -1.7% against -2.5% in Brunei as of 2024.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Brunei and New Zealand?
- 0.8%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and New Zealand?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Brunei and New Zealand rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Brunei ranks 162nd and New Zealand ranks 160th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.