Bermuda vs Dominican Republic: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Bermuda
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 1.7% against 1.6% in Bermuda, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Bermuda ranks 105th and Dominican Republic ranks 104th of 172 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.9% | 4.2% | 5.1% | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 0.7% | 2.3% | 1.7% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Bermuda or Dominican Republic?
- Dominican Republic, at 1.7% against 1.6% in Bermuda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Bermuda and Dominican Republic?
- 0.1%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Dominican Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Bermuda and Dominican Republic rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Bermuda ranks 105th and Dominican Republic ranks 104th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.