Belarus vs IDA only: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Belarus
- IDA only
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 6.5% against 2.7% in IDA only, a difference of 3.8%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 2.4 times IDA only's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1994 it was IDA only ahead.
Belarus ranks 19th and IDA only ranks 18th of 172 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | IDA only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.5% | 0.8% | 1.7% | Belarus |
| 2000s | 11.6% | 2.4% | 9.1% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 5.0% | 1.0% | 4.0% | Belarus |
| 2020s | 5.5% | 1.2% | 4.3% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Belarus or IDA only?
- Belarus, at 6.5% against 2.7% in IDA only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Belarus and IDA only?
- 3.8%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and IDA only?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and IDA only rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Belarus ranks 19th and IDA only ranks 18th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.