Bangladesh vs Kazakhstan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Bangladesh
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 5.4% against 5.3% in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 25th and Kazakhstan ranks 23rd of 172 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4% | -5.7% | 6.2% | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 3.4% | 7.2% | 3.8% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 4.4% | 4.7% | 0.3% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 4.2% | 2.7% | 1.5% | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Bangladesh or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 5.4% against 5.3% in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Bangladesh and Kazakhstan?
- 0.1%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Kazakhstan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Kazakhstan rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Bangladesh ranks 25th and Kazakhstan ranks 23rd of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.