Austria vs Equatorial Guinea: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Austria
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0.1% against -0.1% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.8 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Austria ranks 143rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 145th of 172 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.9% | 17.0% | 16.1% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.3% | 1.6% | 1.3% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 0.0% | -1.6% | 1.7% | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Austria or Equatorial Guinea?
- Austria, at 0.1% against -0.1% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Austria and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.2%, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Equatorial Guinea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Austria and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Austria ranks 143rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 145th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.