Armenia vs IBRD only: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- Armenia
- IBRD only
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 8.8% against 4.2% in IBRD only, a difference of 4.6%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 2.1 times IBRD only's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 7th and IBRD only ranks 9th of 172 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and IBRD only in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | IBRD only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.5% | 2.7% | 2.8% | Armenia |
| 2000s | 7.5% | 4.4% | 3.1% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 4.3% | 4.5% | 0.3% | IBRD only |
| 2020s | 1.1% | 3.7% | 2.6% | IBRD only |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, Armenia or IBRD only?
- Armenia, at 8.8% against 4.2% in IBRD only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between Armenia and IBRD only?
- 4.6%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and IBRD only?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and IBRD only rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- Armenia ranks 7th and IBRD only ranks 9th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.