American Samoa vs Botswana: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth over time
- American Samoa
- Botswana
How they compare
Botswana currently reports -3.8% against -6.3% in American Samoa, a difference of 2.5%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was American Samoa ahead.
American Samoa ranks 169th and Botswana ranks 166th of 172 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, American Samoa averaged higher in 1 and Botswana in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | American Samoa | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.2% | 6.2% | 6.4% | Botswana |
| 2010s | 1.2% | 3.1% | 1.9% | Botswana |
| 2020s | 2.7% | 1.1% | 1.6% | American Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth, American Samoa or Botswana?
- Botswana, at -3.8% against -6.3% in American Samoa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth between American Samoa and Botswana?
- 2.5%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Botswana?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do American Samoa and Botswana rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita growth?
- American Samoa ranks 169th and Botswana ranks 166th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.