Mongolia vs Namibia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita over time
- Mongolia
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 3,656 constant 2015 US$ against 3,561 constant 2015 US$ in Mongolia, a difference of 95 constant 2015 US$.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 101st and Namibia ranks 99th of 171 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,214 constant 2015 US$ | 3,029 constant 2015 US$ | 815.41 constant 2015 US$ | Namibia |
| 2020s | 2,980 constant 2015 US$ | 3,317 constant 2015 US$ | 337.39 constant 2015 US$ | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita, Mongolia or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 3,656 constant 2015 US$ against 3,561 constant 2015 US$ in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita between Mongolia and Namibia?
- 95 constant 2015 US$, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Namibia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
- How do Mongolia and Namibia rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita?
- Mongolia ranks 101st and Namibia ranks 99th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.