Kiribati vs Libya: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita over time
- Kiribati
- Libya
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 2,665 constant 2015 US$ against 2,614 constant 2015 US$ in Libya, a difference of 51 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Libya ahead.
Kiribati ranks 111th and Libya ranks 113th of 172 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,405 constant 2015 US$ | 3,157 constant 2015 US$ | 1,752 constant 2015 US$ | Libya |
| 2020s | 2,215 constant 2015 US$ | 2,465 constant 2015 US$ | 249.72 constant 2015 US$ | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita, Kiribati or Libya?
- Kiribati, at 2,665 constant 2015 US$ against 2,614 constant 2015 US$ in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita between Kiribati and Libya?
- 51 constant 2015 US$, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Libya?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Libya rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita?
- Kiribati ranks 111th and Libya ranks 113th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.