Greenland vs Japan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita over time
- Greenland
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 19,751 constant 2015 US$ against 18,871 constant 2015 US$ in Greenland, a difference of 880 constant 2015 US$.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Greenland ranks 33rd and Japan ranks 32nd of 172 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16,793 constant 2015 US$ | 18,318 constant 2015 US$ | 1,526 constant 2015 US$ | Japan |
| 2010s | 17,840 constant 2015 US$ | 19,371 constant 2015 US$ | 1,531 constant 2015 US$ | Japan |
| 2020s | 18,738 constant 2015 US$ | 19,326 constant 2015 US$ | 588.03 constant 2015 US$ | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita, Greenland or Japan?
- Japan, at 19,751 constant 2015 US$ against 18,871 constant 2015 US$ in Greenland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita between Greenland and Japan?
- 880 constant 2015 US$, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Japan?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Greenland and Japan rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita?
- Greenland ranks 33rd and Japan ranks 32nd of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.