Georgia vs Tonga: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita over time
- Georgia
- Tonga
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 5,116 constant 2015 US$ against 4,874 constant 2015 US$ in Tonga, a difference of 242 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Tonga ahead.
Georgia ranks 82nd and Tonga ranks 85th of 172 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,991 constant 2015 US$ | 4,085 constant 2015 US$ | 1,095 constant 2015 US$ | Tonga |
| 2020s | 4,449 constant 2015 US$ | 4,565 constant 2015 US$ | 115.96 constant 2015 US$ | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita, Georgia or Tonga?
- Georgia, at 5,116 constant 2015 US$ against 4,874 constant 2015 US$ in Tonga as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita between Georgia and Tonga?
- 242 constant 2015 US$, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Tonga?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Tonga rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita?
- Georgia ranks 82nd and Tonga ranks 85th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.