Botswana vs Sri Lanka: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita over time
- Botswana
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 3,122 constant 2015 US$ against 3,001 constant 2015 US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 121 constant 2015 US$.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 106th and Sri Lanka ranks 108th of 172 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,905 constant 2015 US$ | 2,658 constant 2015 US$ | 246.38 constant 2015 US$ | Botswana |
| 2020s | 3,140 constant 2015 US$ | 2,730 constant 2015 US$ | 409.98 constant 2015 US$ | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita, Botswana or Sri Lanka?
- Botswana, at 3,122 constant 2015 US$ against 3,001 constant 2015 US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita between Botswana and Sri Lanka?
- 121 constant 2015 US$, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Sri Lanka?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and Sri Lanka rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure per capita?
- Botswana ranks 106th and Sri Lanka ranks 108th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.