Rwanda vs United States of America: Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series

Rwanda
15.06 trillion current LCU
in 2025
United States of America
20.93 trillion current LCU
in 2025
Rwanda rank
43rd
United States of America rank
40th

Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series over time

  • Rwanda
  • United States of America
05.0T10.0T15.0T20.0T199020072025

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 20.93 trillion current LCU against 15.06 trillion current LCU in Rwanda, a difference of 5.88 trillion current LCU.

That makes United States of America's figure about 1.4 times Rwanda's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 43rd and United States of America ranks 40th of 188 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s 311.11 billion current LCU 4.90 trillion current LCU 4.59 trillion current LCU United States of America
2000s 1.23 trillion current LCU 8.49 trillion current LCU 7.26 trillion current LCU United States of America
2010s 4.64 trillion current LCU 12.20 trillion current LCU 7.55 trillion current LCU United States of America
2020s 10.40 trillion current LCU 17.95 trillion current LCU 7.55 trillion current LCU United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure: linked series, Rwanda or United States of America?
United States of America, at 20.93 trillion current LCU against 15.06 trillion current LCU in Rwanda as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure: linked series between Rwanda and United States of America?
5.88 trillion current LCU, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and United States of America?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Rwanda and United States of America rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure: linked series?
Rwanda ranks 43rd and United States of America ranks 40th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs United States of America: Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-linked-series-current-lcu/rwanda/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-linked-series-current-lcu/rwanda/united-states/">Rwanda vs United States of America: Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
188 places, 5,851 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.