Jordan vs Oman: Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series
Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series over time
- Jordan
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 16.12 billion current LCU against 11.90 billion current LCU in Jordan, a difference of 4.22 billion current LCU.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.4 times Jordan's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 160th and Oman ranks 157th of 188 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.53 billion current LCU | 2.29 billion current LCU | 1.24 billion current LCU | Jordan |
| 2000s | 7.75 billion current LCU | 3.83 billion current LCU | 3.92 billion current LCU | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure: linked series, Jordan or Oman?
- Oman, at 16.12 billion current LCU against 11.90 billion current LCU in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure: linked series between Jordan and Oman?
- 4.22 billion current LCU, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Oman?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2007.
- How do Jordan and Oman rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure: linked series?
- Jordan ranks 160th and Oman ranks 157th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.