Austria vs Central African Republic: Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series

Austria
3.21 % change on previous year
in 2025
Central African Republic
3.38 % change on previous year
in 2025
Austria rank
159th
Central African Republic rank
158th

Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series over time

  • Austria
  • Central African Republic
-40-20020199120082025

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 3.38 % change on previous year against 3.21 % change on previous year in Austria, a difference of 0.17 % change on previous year.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 159th and Central African Republic ranks 158th of 186 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Central African Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 3.98 % change on previous year 4.69 % change on previous year 0.7048 % change on previous year Central African Republic
2000s 3.51 % change on previous year 6.33 % change on previous year 2.82 % change on previous year Central African Republic
2010s 2.89 % change on previous year 5.43 % change on previous year 2.53 % change on previous year Central African Republic
2020s 4.87 % change on previous year 5.21 % change on previous year 0.3454 % change on previous year Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure: linked series, Austria or Central African Republic?
Central African Republic, at 3.38 % change on previous year against 3.21 % change on previous year in Austria as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure: linked series between Austria and Central African Republic?
0.17 % change on previous year, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Central African Republic?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Austria and Central African Republic rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure: linked series?
Austria ranks 159th and Central African Republic ranks 158th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series (current LCU), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Central African Republic: Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-linked-series-current-lcu-annual/austria/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-linked-series-current-lcu-annual/austria/central-african-republic/">Austria vs Central African Republic: Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series (current LCU), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 5,632 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series (current LCU). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.