How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Pakistan?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Pakistan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$)

Congo

1,289 current US$ per person

in 2025

Pakistan

1,334 current US$ per person

in 2025

Congo rank

154th

Pakistan rank

152nd

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) over time

Congo
Pakistan

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 1,334 current US$ per person against 1,289 current US$ per person in Congo, a difference of 45 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 154th and Pakistan ranks 152nd of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Pakistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Pakistan	Difference	Ahead
1960s	134.02 current US$ per person	86.89 current US$ per person	47.13 current US$ per person	Congo
1970s	268.13 current US$ per person	138.92 current US$ per person	129.2 current US$ per person	Congo
1980s	514.55 current US$ per person	253.07 current US$ per person	261.48 current US$ per person	Congo
1990s	339.09 current US$ per person	297.34 current US$ per person	41.75 current US$ per person	Congo
2000s	523.82 current US$ per person	631.6 current US$ per person	107.78 current US$ per person	Pakistan
2010s	924.32 current US$ per person	1,070 current US$ per person	145.82 current US$ per person	Pakistan
2020s	1,093 current US$ per person	1,216 current US$ per person	122.94 current US$ per person	Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$), Congo or Pakistan?: Pakistan, at 1,334 current US$ per person against 1,289 current US$ per person in Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$) between Congo and Pakistan?: 45 current US$ per person, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Pakistan?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Congo and Pakistan rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current us$)?: Congo ranks 154th and Pakistan ranks 152nd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Pakistan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-capita/congo-rep/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-capita/congo-rep/pakistan/">Congo vs Pakistan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per capita
Unit: current US$ per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 233 places, 11,082 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 10 September 2026

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.