Burkina Faso vs Chad: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)

Burkina Faso
349.13 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Chad
331.98 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
37th
Chad rank
39th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Chad
2004006008001.0k196019922025

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 349.13 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 331.98 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Chad, a difference of 17.15 current LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 37th and Chad ranks 39th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 5 and Chad in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Chad Difference Ahead
1960s 215.92 current LCU per US$ of GDP 165.15 current LCU per US$ of GDP 50.77 current LCU per US$ of GDP Burkina Faso
1970s 198.84 current LCU per US$ of GDP 154.4 current LCU per US$ of GDP 44.44 current LCU per US$ of GDP Burkina Faso
1980s 282.07 current LCU per US$ of GDP 325.48 current LCU per US$ of GDP 43.4 current LCU per US$ of GDP Chad
1990s 309.77 current LCU per US$ of GDP 404.75 current LCU per US$ of GDP 94.98 current LCU per US$ of GDP Chad
2000s 473.31 current LCU per US$ of GDP 448.91 current LCU per US$ of GDP 24.4 current LCU per US$ of GDP Burkina Faso
2010s 366.59 current LCU per US$ of GDP 330.17 current LCU per US$ of GDP 36.41 current LCU per US$ of GDP Burkina Faso
2020s 368.69 current LCU per US$ of GDP 356.74 current LCU per US$ of GDP 11.94 current LCU per US$ of GDP Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu), Burkina Faso or Chad?
Burkina Faso, at 349.13 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 331.98 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Chad as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu) between Burkina Faso and Chad?
17.15 current LCU per US$ of GDP, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Chad?
64 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Burkina Faso and Chad rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu)?
Burkina Faso ranks 37th and Chad ranks 39th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Chad: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/burkina-faso/chad/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/burkina-faso/chad/">Burkina Faso vs Chad: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
current LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,684 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.