Jordan vs East Timor: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)
Jordan
119,133 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2007
East Timor
97,973 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
180th
East Timor rank
181st
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) over time
- Jordan
- East Timor
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 119,133 current LCU per square kilometre against 97,973 current LCU per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 21,160 current LCU per square kilometre.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.2 times East Timor's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 180th and East Timor ranks 181st of 188 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu), Jordan or East Timor?
- Jordan, at 119,133 current LCU per square kilometre against 97,973 current LCU per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2007.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu) between Jordan and East Timor?
- 21,160 current LCU per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and East Timor?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2007.
- How do Jordan and East Timor rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu)?
- Jordan ranks 180th and East Timor ranks 181st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.