Guinea vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)

Guinea
548.29 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
450.01 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea rank
16th
Rwanda rank
18th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) over time

  • Guinea
  • Rwanda
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 548.29 million current LCU per square kilometre against 450.01 million current LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 98.28 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Rwanda ahead.

Guinea ranks 16th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 188 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Rwanda Difference Ahead
1980s 3.00 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.70 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.69 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 10.42 million current LCU per square kilometre 11.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 794,663 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 54.81 million current LCU per square kilometre 49.98 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.83 million current LCU per square kilometre Guinea
2010s 232.29 million current LCU per square kilometre 188.23 million current LCU per square kilometre 44.06 million current LCU per square kilometre Guinea
2020s 474.30 million current LCU per square kilometre 352.07 million current LCU per square kilometre 122.22 million current LCU per square kilometre Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu), Guinea or Rwanda?
Guinea, at 548.29 million current LCU per square kilometre against 450.01 million current LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu) between Guinea and Rwanda?
98.28 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Rwanda?
38 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2023.
How do Guinea and Rwanda rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu)?
Guinea ranks 16th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guinea/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guinea/rwanda/">Guinea vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 8,161 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.