Cuba vs Germany: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)

Cuba
6.48 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany
6.35 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
100th
Germany rank
102nd

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) over time

  • Cuba
  • Germany
02.0M4.0M6.0M197019962023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 6.48 million current LCU per square kilometre against 6.35 million current LCU per square kilometre in Germany, a difference of 132,950 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Germany ahead.

Cuba ranks 100th and Germany ranks 102nd of 188 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Germany Difference Ahead
1970s 50,768 current LCU per square kilometre 986,389 current LCU per square kilometre 935,620 current LCU per square kilometre Germany
1980s 98,352 current LCU per square kilometre 1.81 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.71 million current LCU per square kilometre Germany
1990s 128,279 current LCU per square kilometre 2.92 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.79 million current LCU per square kilometre Germany
2000s 226,420 current LCU per square kilometre 3.79 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.57 million current LCU per square kilometre Germany
2010s 441,044 current LCU per square kilometre 4.72 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.28 million current LCU per square kilometre Germany
2020s 3.39 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.65 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.27 million current LCU per square kilometre Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu), Cuba or Germany?
Cuba, at 6.48 million current LCU per square kilometre against 6.35 million current LCU per square kilometre in Germany as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu) between Cuba and Germany?
132,950 current LCU per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Germany?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Germany rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu)?
Cuba ranks 100th and Germany ranks 102nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Germany: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cuba/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cuba/germany/">Cuba vs Germany: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 8,161 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.