Congo vs Mexico: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)

Congo
12.00 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
11.45 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
78th
Mexico rank
80th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) over time

  • Congo
  • Mexico
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 12.00 million current LCU per square kilometre against 11.45 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 551,300 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 78th and Mexico ranks 80th of 188 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 6 and Mexico in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 119,973 current LCU per square kilometre 106.45 current LCU per square kilometre 119,867 current LCU per square kilometre Congo
1970s 300,878 current LCU per square kilometre 444.16 current LCU per square kilometre 300,434 current LCU per square kilometre Congo
1980s 1.03 million current LCU per square kilometre 47,012 current LCU per square kilometre 985,999 current LCU per square kilometre Congo
1990s 1.19 million current LCU per square kilometre 968,575 current LCU per square kilometre 226,002 current LCU per square kilometre Congo
2000s 3.06 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.54 million current LCU per square kilometre 481,765 current LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 7.36 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.84 million current LCU per square kilometre 523,228 current LCU per square kilometre Congo
2020s 10.57 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 632,870 current LCU per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu), Congo or Mexico?
Congo, at 12.00 million current LCU per square kilometre against 11.45 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu) between Congo and Mexico?
551,300 current LCU per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Mexico rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu)?
Congo ranks 78th and Mexico ranks 80th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mexico: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mexico/">Congo vs Mexico: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 8,161 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.