Comoros vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)

Comoros
362.81 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
450.01 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Comoros rank
21st
Rwanda rank
18th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) over time

  • Comoros
  • Rwanda
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 450.01 million current LCU per square kilometre against 362.81 million current LCU per square kilometre in Comoros, a difference of 87.20 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Comoros's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Comoros ahead.

Comoros ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 18th of 188 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Rwanda Difference Ahead
1980s 38.64 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.04 million current LCU per square kilometre 34.60 million current LCU per square kilometre Comoros
1990s 65.96 million current LCU per square kilometre 11.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 54.75 million current LCU per square kilometre Comoros
2000s 121.12 million current LCU per square kilometre 49.98 million current LCU per square kilometre 71.14 million current LCU per square kilometre Comoros
2010s 215.74 million current LCU per square kilometre 188.23 million current LCU per square kilometre 27.51 million current LCU per square kilometre Comoros
2020s 314.73 million current LCU per square kilometre 352.07 million current LCU per square kilometre 37.35 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu), Comoros or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 450.01 million current LCU per square kilometre against 362.81 million current LCU per square kilometre in Comoros as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu) between Comoros and Rwanda?
87.20 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Rwanda?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Comoros and Rwanda rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu)?
Comoros ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 18th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Comoros vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/comoros/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/comoros/rwanda/">Comoros vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 8,161 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.