China vs Norway: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)

China
5.45 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
5.80 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
109th
Norway rank
107th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) over time

  • China
  • Norway
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 5.80 million current LCU per square kilometre against 5.45 million current LCU per square kilometre in China, a difference of 340,320 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times China's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

China ranks 109th and Norway ranks 107th of 188 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 16,233 current LCU per square kilometre 233,102 current LCU per square kilometre 216,868 current LCU per square kilometre Norway
1980s 50,085 current LCU per square kilometre 688,744 current LCU per square kilometre 638,659 current LCU per square kilometre Norway
1990s 266,158 current LCU per square kilometre 1.29 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.02 million current LCU per square kilometre Norway
2000s 833,510 current LCU per square kilometre 2.32 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.49 million current LCU per square kilometre Norway
2010s 2.80 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.90 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.10 million current LCU per square kilometre Norway
2020s 4.86 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 365,228 current LCU per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu), China or Norway?
Norway, at 5.80 million current LCU per square kilometre against 5.45 million current LCU per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu) between China and Norway?
340,320 current LCU per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Norway?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do China and Norway rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu)?
China ranks 109th and Norway ranks 107th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Norway: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/china/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/china/norway/">China vs Norway: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 8,161 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.