Canada vs Zimbabwe: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)

Canada
187,399 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
146,810 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
176th
Zimbabwe rank
179th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) over time

  • Canada
  • Zimbabwe
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 187,399 current LCU per square kilometre against 146,810 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 40,589 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 176th and Zimbabwe ranks 179th of 188 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 4,017 current LCU per square kilometre 0.9906 current LCU per square kilometre 4,016 current LCU per square kilometre Canada
1970s 10,590 current LCU per square kilometre 2.57 current LCU per square kilometre 10,588 current LCU per square kilometre Canada
1980s 29,445 current LCU per square kilometre 4.81 current LCU per square kilometre 29,440 current LCU per square kilometre Canada
1990s 51,896 current LCU per square kilometre 5.08 current LCU per square kilometre 51,891 current LCU per square kilometre Canada
2000s 84,644 current LCU per square kilometre 5.62 current LCU per square kilometre 84,638 current LCU per square kilometre Canada
2010s 126,587 current LCU per square kilometre 51.75 current LCU per square kilometre 126,535 current LCU per square kilometre Canada
2020s 165,255 current LCU per square kilometre 42,336 current LCU per square kilometre 122,919 current LCU per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu), Canada or Zimbabwe?
Canada, at 187,399 current LCU per square kilometre against 146,810 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu) between Canada and Zimbabwe?
40,589 current LCU per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Zimbabwe rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu)?
Canada ranks 176th and Zimbabwe ranks 179th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Zimbabwe: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/canada/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/canada/zimbabwe/">Canada vs Zimbabwe: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 8,161 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.