Brazil vs Tunisia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)

Brazil
823,871 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
755,832 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
150th
Tunisia rank
153rd

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) over time

  • Brazil
  • Tunisia
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 823,871 current LCU per square kilometre against 755,832 current LCU per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 68,039 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Tunisia ahead.

Brazil ranks 150th and Tunisia ranks 153rd of 188 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 1,970 current LCU per square kilometre 1,970 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 6,487 current LCU per square kilometre 6,487 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 0.003 current LCU per square kilometre 25,497 current LCU per square kilometre 25,497 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 38,192 current LCU per square kilometre 70,869 current LCU per square kilometre 32,677 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 156,752 current LCU per square kilometre 167,014 current LCU per square kilometre 10,262 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 434,470 current LCU per square kilometre 401,156 current LCU per square kilometre 33,314 current LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 705,248 current LCU per square kilometre 658,160 current LCU per square kilometre 47,088 current LCU per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu), Brazil or Tunisia?
Brazil, at 823,871 current LCU per square kilometre against 755,832 current LCU per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu) between Brazil and Tunisia?
68,039 current LCU per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Tunisia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Tunisia rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu)?
Brazil ranks 150th and Tunisia ranks 153rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Tunisia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/tunisia/">Brazil vs Tunisia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 8,161 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.