Hong Kong, China vs Kenya: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)

Hong Kong, China
294,175 current LCU per person
in 2025
Kenya
235,074 current LCU per person
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
68th
Kenya rank
71st

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Kenya
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196019922025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 294,175 current LCU per person against 235,074 current LCU per person in Kenya, a difference of 59,101 current LCU per person.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.3 times Kenya's.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 68th and Kenya ranks 71st of 190 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Kenya Difference Ahead
1960s 2,440 current LCU per person 554.68 current LCU per person 1,885 current LCU per person Hong Kong, China
1970s 7,758 current LCU per person 1,147 current LCU per person 6,611 current LCU per person Hong Kong, China
1980s 32,175 current LCU per person 3,294 current LCU per person 28,881 current LCU per person Hong Kong, China
1990s 101,060 current LCU per person 13,599 current LCU per person 87,461 current LCU per person Hong Kong, China
2000s 124,848 current LCU per person 34,609 current LCU per person 90,240 current LCU per person Hong Kong, China
2010s 212,444 current LCU per person 107,168 current LCU per person 105,276 current LCU per person Hong Kong, China
2020s 266,425 current LCU per person 197,034 current LCU per person 69,391 current LCU per person Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu), Hong Kong, China or Kenya?
Hong Kong, China, at 294,175 current LCU per person against 235,074 current LCU per person in Kenya as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu) between Hong Kong, China and Kenya?
59,101 current LCU per person, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Kenya?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Kenya rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu)?
Hong Kong, China ranks 68th and Kenya ranks 71st of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Kenya: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/kenya/">Hong Kong, China vs Kenya: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per capita
Unit
current LCU per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 8,736 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.