How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Pakistan?

64 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Pakistan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)

Chad

339,399 current LCU per person

in 2025

Pakistan

372,874 current LCU per person

in 2025

Chad rank

62nd

Pakistan rank

59th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) over time

Chad
Pakistan

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 372,874 current LCU per person against 339,399 current LCU per person in Chad, a difference of 33,475 current LCU per person.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 62nd and Pakistan ranks 59th of 190 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Pakistan	Difference	Ahead
1960s	19,600 current LCU per person	413.79 current LCU per person	19,187 current LCU per person	Chad
1970s	27,631 current LCU per person	1,106 current LCU per person	26,525 current LCU per person	Chad
1980s	66,085 current LCU per person	3,703 current LCU per person	62,382 current LCU per person	Chad
1990s	88,708 current LCU per person	9,606 current LCU per person	79,101 current LCU per person	Chad
2000s	219,392 current LCU per person	38,901 current LCU per person	180,491 current LCU per person	Chad
2010s	350,400 current LCU per person	110,181 current LCU per person	240,219 current LCU per person	Chad
2020s	340,284 current LCU per person	267,218 current LCU per person	73,066 current LCU per person	Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu), Chad or Pakistan?: Pakistan, at 372,874 current LCU per person against 339,399 current LCU per person in Chad as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu) between Chad and Pakistan?: 33,475 current LCU per person, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Pakistan?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Chad and Pakistan rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (current lcu)?: Chad ranks 62nd and Pakistan ranks 59th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Pakistan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-capita/chad/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-capita/chad/pakistan/">Chad vs Pakistan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per capita
Unit: current LCU per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 190 places, 8,736 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 09 September 2026

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.