Russian Federation vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure

Russian Federation
62.18 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
81.79 trillion constant LCU
in 2025
Russian Federation rank
17th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
15th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
20.0T40.0T60.0T80.0T199020072025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 81.79 trillion constant LCU against 62.18 trillion constant LCU in Russian Federation, a difference of 19.62 trillion constant LCU.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.3 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 17th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 15th of 179 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 17.88 trillion constant LCU 24.87 trillion constant LCU 6.99 trillion constant LCU Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 29.42 trillion constant LCU 35.44 trillion constant LCU 6.01 trillion constant LCU Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 47.72 trillion constant LCU 58.45 trillion constant LCU 10.73 trillion constant LCU Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 55.18 trillion constant LCU 75.80 trillion constant LCU 20.62 trillion constant LCU Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, Russian Federation or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 81.79 trillion constant LCU against 62.18 trillion constant LCU in Russian Federation as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure between Russian Federation and Tanzania, United Republic of?
19.62 trillion constant LCU, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Tanzania, United Republic of?
30 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Russian Federation and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure?
Russian Federation ranks 17th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 15th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu/russian-federation/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu/russian-federation/tanzania/">Russian Federation vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)
Unit
constant LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 7,445 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.