Kyrgyzstan vs Malaysia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Malaysia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 1.10 trillion constant LCU against 1.05 trillion constant LCU in Malaysia, a difference of 43.44 billion constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Malaysia ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 78th and Malaysia ranks 79th of 179 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 440.57 billion constant LCU | 625.19 billion constant LCU | 184.62 billion constant LCU | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 743.64 billion constant LCU | 922.70 billion constant LCU | 179.06 billion constant LCU | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure, Kyrgyzstan or Malaysia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 1.10 trillion constant LCU against 1.05 trillion constant LCU in Malaysia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure between Kyrgyzstan and Malaysia?
- 43.44 billion constant LCU, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Malaysia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Malaysia rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 78th and Malaysia ranks 79th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This field includes expenditure on goods and services by the Household and NPISH sector for the direct satisfaction of human needs or wants, whether individual or collective. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.