South Korea vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)

South Korea
593.62 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Rwanda
850.9 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
South Korea rank
17th
Rwanda rank
16th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) over time

  • South Korea
  • Rwanda
05.0k10.0k15.0k196019922025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 850.9 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 593.62 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in South Korea, a difference of 257.28 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.4 times South Korea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Rwanda ahead.

South Korea ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 16th of 179 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 10,965 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 8,100 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 2,865 constant LCU per US$ of GDP South Korea
1970s 4,913 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 3,907 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 1,006 constant LCU per US$ of GDP South Korea
1980s 1,720 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 1,380 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 340.68 constant LCU per US$ of GDP South Korea
1990s 966.13 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 1,582 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 616.01 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2000s 834.07 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 1,675 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 841.05 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2010s 609.73 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 1,148 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 538.29 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2020s 574.68 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 913.23 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 338.55 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), South Korea or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 850.9 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 593.62 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in South Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu) between South Korea and Rwanda?
257.28 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Rwanda?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do South Korea and Rwanda rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu)?
South Korea ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 16th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/korea-rep/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/korea-rep/rwanda/">South Korea vs Rwanda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 7,434 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.