Indonesia vs Paraguay: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)

Indonesia
5,069 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Paraguay
3,306 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Indonesia rank
4th
Paraguay rank
6th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) over time

  • Indonesia
  • Paraguay
020.0k40.0k60.0k196219932025

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 5,069 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 3,306 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Paraguay, a difference of 1,763 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.5 times Paraguay's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 4th and Paraguay ranks 6th of 179 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Paraguay Difference Ahead
1960s 54,812 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 31,236 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 23,576 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Indonesia
1970s 26,211 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 18,704 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 7,507 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Indonesia
1980s 14,069 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 9,851 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 4,218 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Indonesia
1990s 13,843 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 7,599 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 6,245 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Indonesia
2000s 10,996 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 6,619 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 4,377 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Indonesia
2010s 5,236 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 3,205 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 2,031 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Indonesia
2020s 5,062 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 3,452 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 1,609 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), Indonesia or Paraguay?
Indonesia, at 5,069 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 3,306 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Paraguay as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu) between Indonesia and Paraguay?
1,763 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Paraguay?
59 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2025.
How do Indonesia and Paraguay rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu)?
Indonesia ranks 4th and Paraguay ranks 6th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Paraguay: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/indonesia/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/indonesia/paraguay/">Indonesia vs Paraguay: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 7,434 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.