Guatemala vs Honduras: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)

Guatemala
4.76 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Honduras
5.53 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Guatemala rank
90th
Honduras rank
87th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Honduras
01020304050196019922025

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 5.53 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 4.76 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Guatemala, a difference of 0.77 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Honduras's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 90th and Honduras ranks 87th of 179 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 5 and Honduras in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Honduras Difference Ahead
1960s 46.86 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 4.38 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 42.48 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Guatemala
1970s 30.96 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 3.02 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 27.94 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Guatemala
1980s 16.16 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 2.33 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 13.82 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Guatemala
1990s 13.9 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 7.11 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 6.79 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Guatemala
2000s 10.36 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 9.6 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.7575 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Guatemala
2010s 6.53 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 6.88 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.3559 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Honduras
2020s 5.25 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 6.1 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 0.8458 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), Guatemala or Honduras?
Honduras, at 5.53 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 4.76 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Guatemala as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu) between Guatemala and Honduras?
0.77 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Honduras?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Guatemala and Honduras rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu)?
Guatemala ranks 90th and Honduras ranks 87th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Honduras: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/guatemala/honduras/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/guatemala/honduras/">Guatemala vs Honduras: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 7,434 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.