Democratic Republic of Congo vs Pakistan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)

Democratic Republic of Congo
106.36 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Pakistan
98.61 constant LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
42nd
Pakistan rank
43rd

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Pakistan
0200400600800198620052025

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 106.36 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 98.61 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Pakistan, a difference of 7.75 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Democratic Republic of Congo's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of Congo has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 42nd and Pakistan ranks 43rd of 179 countries.

Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s 657.24 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 200.57 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 456.67 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
2000s 353.82 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 123.42 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 230.4 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 192.22 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 88.93 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 103.3 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s 132.74 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 102.05 constant LCU per US$ of GDP 30.69 constant LCU per US$ of GDP Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), Democratic Republic of Congo or Pakistan?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 106.36 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 98.61 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu) between Democratic Republic of Congo and Pakistan?
7.75 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Pakistan?
33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Pakistan rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu)?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 42nd and Pakistan ranks 43rd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Pakistan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/pakistan/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Pakistan: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 7,434 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.