Guatemala vs Norway: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)

Guatemala
4.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
5.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
87th
Norway rank
86th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Norway
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 5.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 4.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 206,880 constant LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 87th and Norway ranks 86th of 175 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 961,022 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre 268,701 constant LCU per square kilometre Norway
1980s 1.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre 375,966 constant LCU per square kilometre Norway
1990s 1.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre 313,999 constant LCU per square kilometre Norway
2000s 2.50 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre 469,268 constant LCU per square kilometre Norway
2010s 3.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre 648,553 constant LCU per square kilometre Norway
2020s 4.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre 341,210 constant LCU per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), Guatemala or Norway?
Norway, at 5.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 4.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu) between Guatemala and Norway?
206,880 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Norway?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Norway rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu)?
Guatemala ranks 87th and Norway ranks 86th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Norway: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/norway/">Guatemala vs Norway: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 6,933 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.