Finland vs Tunisia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)

Finland
405,517 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
458,445 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
146th
Tunisia rank
145th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) over time

  • Finland
  • Tunisia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196519942023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 458,445 constant LCU per square kilometre against 405,517 constant LCU per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 52,928 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 146th and Tunisia ranks 145th of 175 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 4 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 151,716 constant LCU per square kilometre 47,986 constant LCU per square kilometre 103,730 constant LCU per square kilometre Finland
1980s 208,914 constant LCU per square kilometre 87,854 constant LCU per square kilometre 121,059 constant LCU per square kilometre Finland
1990s 250,948 constant LCU per square kilometre 122,447 constant LCU per square kilometre 128,501 constant LCU per square kilometre Finland
2000s 334,419 constant LCU per square kilometre 201,033 constant LCU per square kilometre 133,386 constant LCU per square kilometre Finland
2010s 389,588 constant LCU per square kilometre 400,595 constant LCU per square kilometre 11,007 constant LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 401,452 constant LCU per square kilometre 447,678 constant LCU per square kilometre 46,226 constant LCU per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), Finland or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 458,445 constant LCU per square kilometre against 405,517 constant LCU per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu) between Finland and Tunisia?
52,928 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Tunisia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Finland and Tunisia rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu)?
Finland ranks 146th and Tunisia ranks 145th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Tunisia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/finland/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/finland/tunisia/">Finland vs Tunisia: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 6,933 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.