Costa Rica vs Uganda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)

Costa Rica
607.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
523.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
10th
Uganda rank
12th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Uganda
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 607.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 523.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 83.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Uganda's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 10th and Uganda ranks 12th of 175 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Uganda Difference Ahead
1980s 137.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre 71.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre 66.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 203.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre 113.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre 90.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 293.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre 198.77 million constant LCU per square kilometre 95.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 468.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre 361.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre 106.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 566.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre 492.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre 74.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), Costa Rica or Uganda?
Costa Rica, at 607.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 523.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu) between Costa Rica and Uganda?
83.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Uganda?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Uganda rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu)?
Costa Rica ranks 10th and Uganda ranks 12th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Uganda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/uganda/">Costa Rica vs Uganda: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 6,933 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.