China vs Sao Tome and Principe: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)

China
5.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
5.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
85th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
83rd

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) over time

  • China
  • Sao Tome and Principe
02.0M4.0M6.0M199520092023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 5.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 5.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre in China, a difference of 295,430 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times China's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

China ranks 85th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 83rd of 175 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 1.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 3.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 4.77 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre 580,100 constant LCU per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), China or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 5.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 5.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu) between China and Sao Tome and Principe?
295,430 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sao Tome and Principe?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do China and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu)?
China ranks 85th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 83rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Sao Tome and Principe: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/china/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/china/sao-tome-and-principe/">China vs Sao Tome and Principe: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 6,933 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.