Cambodia vs Costa Rica: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)

Cambodia
519.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
607.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
13th
Costa Rica rank
10th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) over time

  • Cambodia
  • Costa Rica
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 607.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 519.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Cambodia, a difference of 87.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Cambodia's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 13th and Costa Rica ranks 10th of 175 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1990s 111.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre 218.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre 106.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 196.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre 293.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre 97.77 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 395.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre 468.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre 72.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 493.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre 566.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre 73.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), Cambodia or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 607.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 519.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu) between Cambodia and Costa Rica?
87.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Costa Rica?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Costa Rica rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu)?
Cambodia ranks 13th and Costa Rica ranks 10th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Costa Rica: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/costa-rica/">Cambodia vs Costa Rica: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 6,933 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.