Burkina Faso vs Iceland: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)

Burkina Faso
23.77 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
17.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
54th
Iceland rank
56th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Iceland
5.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M196519942023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 23.77 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 17.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 6.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.3 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Iceland ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 54th and Iceland ranks 56th of 175 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 6.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre 8.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 11.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre 815,633 constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 17.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre 13.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 22.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre 16.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), Burkina Faso or Iceland?
Burkina Faso, at 23.77 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 17.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu) between Burkina Faso and Iceland?
6.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Iceland?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Iceland rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu)?
Burkina Faso ranks 54th and Iceland ranks 56th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Iceland: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/iceland/">Burkina Faso vs Iceland: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 6,933 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.