Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)

Botswana
148,548 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
146,810 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
164th
Zimbabwe rank
166th

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) over time

  • Botswana
  • Zimbabwe
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k197519992023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 148,548 constant LCU per square kilometre against 146,810 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,738 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Botswana ranks 164th and Zimbabwe ranks 166th of 175 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 82,236 constant LCU per square kilometre 107,493 constant LCU per square kilometre 25,257 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 111,123 constant LCU per square kilometre 154,870 constant LCU per square kilometre 43,746 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 139,747 constant LCU per square kilometre 136,728 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,018 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu), Botswana or Zimbabwe?
Botswana, at 148,548 constant LCU per square kilometre against 146,810 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu) between Botswana and Zimbabwe?
1,738 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Zimbabwe rank globally for households and npishs final consumption expenditure (constant lcu)?
Botswana ranks 164th and Zimbabwe ranks 166th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/households-and-npishs-final-consumption-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zimbabwe/">Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 6,933 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.